Steel Tariffs and Sticker Shock: Building in the New Cost Reality
    Photo by Tigran Kharatyan on Unsplash
    6 min read

    Steel Tariffs and Sticker Shock: Building in the New Cost Reality

    By Andrew LeBaron|

    — views
    Commercial Real Estate
    23,000+ subscribers

    TL;DR

    Steel and aluminum tariffs started at 25% in February and jumped to 50% by June 2025, impacting more than 400 product categories used in construction. Overall construction costs have risen 3-5% across all project types. Office construction has collapsed to 82% below Q1 2020 levels with just 22 million square feet under construction nationally. Retail completions hit their lowest level in a decade at 4.5 million square feet in Q1. The new cost reality is making adaptive reuse the smartest play in commercial real estate.

    The Tariff Impact

    Let's talk numbers because the scale of what's happening in construction costs is something every CRE investor needs to understand. The steel and aluminum tariffs that began at 25% in February 2025 escalated to 50% by June, and the ripple effects have been immediate and widespread.

    More than 400 product categories are now affected — everything from structural steel and rebar to HVAC equipment, electrical components, and finishing materials. The direct cost increase on steel-intensive projects is running 8-12%, while the broader impact across all construction types is settling in at 3-5%.

    For a $50 million multifamily development, that's an additional $1.5 to $2.5 million in hard costs. For institutional-scale projects, the numbers get staggering quickly. And unlike interest rate changes that can be hedged or structured around, material cost increases are baked into every bid from every contractor.

    Construction site impacted by rising material costs
    Construction site impacted by rising material costs

    U.S. Construction Cost Index (2019–2026)

    Construction costs have climbed over 40% since 2019, dramatically raising the bar for new development feasibility and making adaptive reuse increasingly competitive.

    Think you know the real numbers behind these deals?

    5 questions · ~3 min

    Construction Pipeline Collapse

    The tariff shock comes on top of a construction pipeline that was already contracting. The numbers paint a stark picture:

    • Office construction is 82% below Q1 2020 levels, with just 22 million square feet under construction nationally. That's not a slowdown — it's a near-complete halt.
    • Retail completions hit their lowest level in a decade at 4.5 million square feet in Q1 2025.
    • Multifamily starts have pulled back significantly as developers re-underwrite projects at higher cost bases.

    The practical effect is a supply constraint that will take years to unwind. Fewer projects starting today means fewer deliveries in 2027 and 2028, which means the existing built environment becomes more valuable as replacement costs climb and cap rates reset.

    This is a dynamic I've watched play out multiple times in my career. Periods of reduced construction activity create the conditions for the next cycle of rent growth and asset appreciation. The question is always whether you're positioned to benefit from that cycle or watching from the sidelines.

    Industrial facility representing steel-intensive construction
    Industrial facility representing steel-intensive construction

    U.S. Office Construction Under Way (M SF, 2019–2026)

    New office construction has plummeted as developers respond to record vacancy and uncertain demand, setting the stage for eventual supply-side tightening.

    The Adaptive Reuse Advantage

    Here's where the tariff story connects directly to our investment thesis at F6 Partners. When new construction costs rise 3-5% or more, the economics of adaptive reuse improve proportionally.

    Converting an existing hotel, office building, or retail property into residential use avoids the majority of steel and material cost increases because the structural shell already exists. You're working with existing foundations, framing, and building envelopes. The tariff impact on a conversion project is a fraction of what it is on ground-up construction.

    Building under construction facing tariff cost increases
    Building under construction facing tariff cost increases

    Think about it this way: if it now costs $250 per square foot to build new multifamily and you can convert an existing structure for $120 per square foot, the spread has widened. That wider spread translates directly into better returns for investors and more feasible project economics for developers.

    The tariff environment has made every adaptive reuse project in our pipeline more attractive relative to its ground-up competition. That's not wishful thinking — it's arithmetic.

    New Construction vs Adaptive Reuse Cost per SF (2019–2026)

    The cost gap between new construction and adaptive reuse has widened sharply, making building conversions increasingly attractive compared to ground-up development.

    Positioning for the Future

    I believe we're entering a period where the operators who thrive will be the ones who adapt their strategies to the new cost reality rather than waiting for tariffs to be rolled back. Trade policy is unpredictable — as Liberation Day demonstrated — but the structural advantages of adaptive reuse are permanent.

    At F6 Partners, we're doubling down on conversion opportunities — hotels to apartments, obsolete offices to residential, underutilized retail to mixed-use. Every one of these projects benefits from the tariff-driven widening of the cost gap between new construction and adaptive reuse.

    For investors, the takeaway is clear: the tariffs have raised the floor under existing asset values while making new supply harder to deliver. If you own well-located real estate, your replacement cost advantage just got bigger. If you're looking to deploy capital, adaptive reuse offers the best risk-adjusted path to creating housing in a higher-cost environment.

    The market rewards those who see disruption as opportunity. Steel tariffs and sticker shock are real — but so is the adaptive reuse advantage.

    Test Your Knowledge

    How well do you know commercial real estate?

    Market BenchmarksHistorical Comparison (Q2 2025)
    JAN 1ST
    4.57%
    LAST MONTH
    4.25%
    10-YR TREASURY (TODAY)
    4.41%
    JAN 1ST
    38.6%
    LAST MONTH
    52.0%
    STUDENT PRE-LEASE
    65.2%
    JAN 1ST
    85.4%
    LAST MONTH
    85.5%
    SENIOR OCCUPANCY
    85.5%
    JAN 1ST
    4.5%
    LAST MONTH
    4.8%
    BTR RENT GROWTH
    5.1%
    JAN 1ST
    $91.20
    LAST MONTH
    $93.50
    HOSPITALITY REVPAR
    $98.40
    JAN 1ST
    760k
    LAST MONTH
    808k
    ACTIVE RESI UNITS
    830k
    Multifamily Market BenchmarksHistorical Comparison (May 2026)
    JAN 1ST
    6.4%
    LAST WEEK
    5.9%
    MF VACANCY RATE
    5.9%
    JAN 1ST
    1.2%
    LAST WEEK
    2.1%
    MF RENT GROWTH
    2.2%
    JAN 1ST
    5.3%
    LAST WEEK
    5.12%
    MF AVG CAP RATE
    5.13%
    JAN 1ST
    62k
    LAST WEEK
    87k
    MF NET ABSORPTION
    88k
    JAN 1ST
    89k
    LAST WEEK
    99k
    MF NEW SUPPLY
    100k
    JAN 1ST
    0.82%
    LAST WEEK
    0.78%
    MF LOAN DELINQUENCY
    0.79%
    Andrew LeBaron's signature

    Andrew LeBaron

    Sources & References

    Email

    Comments (0)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Andrew LeBaron

    Andrew LeBaron

    13+ Years in Real Estate & Capital Raising

    Covering commercial real estate projects he is connected to and niche commercial RE trends including student & senior housing, adaptive reuse, hotel conversions, and the intersection of faith and finance.

    LinkedIn

    You Might Also Like

    Never Miss an Insight

    Join 23,000+ readers. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Loading publication…

    I send one weekly newsletter covering all of these topics. Let me know what interests you most so I can write what matters to you.

    The LeBaron Letter

    All the data contained within this website is as of 2026 unless otherwise noted. The material on this website is intended for informational purposes only, does not constitute investment advice or analysis, or a recommendation, or an offer of solicitation, and is not the basis for any contract or other agreement to make any investment, or for Andrew LeBaron, LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC, or any of their affiliated entities to enter into or arrange any type of transaction. Nothing on this website should be construed as a guarantee of any particular outcome or result.

    Past Performance: Any performance data or comments expressed on this website are an indication of past performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and no representation is being made that any investment will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those achieved in the past, or that significant losses will be avoided. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.

    Forward-Looking Statements: The contents of this website may contain forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections about the real estate industry, the financial industry, the economy, Andrew LeBaron, LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC, and their affiliated entities and investments. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Furthermore, Andrew LeBaron and LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC undertake no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    No Professional Advice: The information provided on this website does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or other professional advice. You should consult your own professional advisors before making any investment decisions. Andrew LeBaron and LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC are not registered investment advisors, broker-dealers, or financial planners.