DOGE and the Federal Lease Exodus: What It Means for Office CRE
    Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
    6 min read

    DOGE and the Federal Lease Exodus: What It Means for Office CRE

    By Andrew LeBaron|

    — views
    Commercial Real Estate
    23,000+ subscribers

    TL;DR

    The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has slashed thousands of federal jobs and broken hundreds of office leases across the country, with the Washington DC metro area absorbing the greatest impact. National office vacancy stands at 20.4% — the highest in the modern era. But here's the bifurcation story that matters: NYC Midtown has returned to pre-pandemic rent levels, San Francisco is showing genuine signs of turning around, and Class A assets are dramatically outperforming commodity office everywhere. The office market isn't dying — it's splitting into two completely different realities.

    The DOGE Impact: DC Takes the Hit

    Let me lay out the DOGE situation clearly because the headlines have been both alarmist and incomplete. The Department of Government Efficiency executed its mandate aggressively — cutting thousands of federal positions and terminating hundreds of office leases that had anchored the DC metro commercial real estate market for decades.

    The impact on Washington DC has been severe and concentrated. Federal agencies historically occupied millions of square feet across Northern Virginia, suburban Maryland, and downtown DC. When those leases broke, the vacancy shock rippled through the entire metro area. Sublease availability spiked. Direct vacancy in some DC submarkets pushed well past 25%. Landlords who built portfolios around government tenancy found their cash flows impaired almost overnight — though DC's 20-year tax abatement for office-to-residential conversions is now turning some of that distress into development opportunity.

    At F6 Partners, we've been warning our investors about government tenant concentration risk for years. The DOGE disruption validates a core principle of our investment philosophy: never build a thesis around a single demand driver, no matter how reliable it appears. Diversification of tenancy isn't just prudent — it's essential.

    Commercial real estate signage
    Commercial real estate signage

    Office Construction Starts Index (2019=100)

    New office construction starts have plummeted to a fraction of 2019 levels, as developers respond to record vacancy by pulling back dramatically from new projects.

    Think you know the real numbers behind these deals?

    5 questions · ~3 min

    20.4% Vacancy: The National Context

    The 20.4% national office vacancy is a real number — one that raises the question of whether office CRE has finally found its bottom — and it deserves serious attention. But context is everything. That figure includes everything from trophy towers in gateway cities to Class C suburban office parks in tertiary markets that were struggling before the pandemic ever hit.

    The dispersion within the office sector is wider than in any other commercial real estate asset class. The top quartile of office buildings in top-tier markets is performing in an entirely different universe than the bottom quartile. Understanding that spread is the difference between a smart investment and a catastrophic one.

    What's often missed in the vacancy discussion is the supply side. Office construction has collapsed — down 82% from Q1 2020 levels. Virtually no new competitive supply is entering the market. That kind of supply-side discipline historically precedes recovery, even in deeply challenged sectors.

    Contemporary residential exterior architecture
    Contemporary residential exterior architecture

    U.S. National Office Vacancy Rate (%)

    National office vacancy has climbed to record levels as remote work reshapes space demand, though Class A space in walkable urban cores continues to outperform.

    NYC Midtown and the Flight to Quality

    The counternarrative to the DOGE story is playing out in Manhattan. NYC Midtown asking rents for top-tier space have returned to pre-pandemic levels, driven by financial services firms competing aggressively for premium workplace environments. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and other major employers enforced return-to-office mandates and concentrated their footprints in the best buildings.

    Suburban commercial strip center
    Suburban commercial strip center

    This is the flight-to-quality trade made manifest. When companies do bring employees back, they want the best space in the best location with the best amenities. Trophy Class A buildings with modern mechanical systems, flexible floor plates, and hospitality-grade lobbies are winning. Everything else is losing.

    San Francisco is showing early signs of the same dynamic. After years as the poster child for office market distress, SF's best buildings are seeing leasing velocity improve as AI companies and tech firms that survived the downturn expand their footprints. The recovery is still early and concentrated in Class A, but the direction is encouraging.

    NYC Midtown Class A Asking Rent ($/SF)

    Class A asking rents in Midtown Manhattan have defied the broader office downturn, climbing to record highs as top-tier tenants compete for the best buildings.

    What This Means for Investors

    At F6 Partners, our core focus remains student and senior housing — asset classes where the demand drivers are demographic, not cyclical. But the office bifurcation creates adjacent opportunities we're watching closely.

    The adaptive reuse pipeline is expanding toward 70,700 units nationally as owners of obsolete office buildings explore residential, life sciences, and mixed-use conversions. Cities are streamlining approvals. Tax incentives are proliferating. The buildings that can't compete as offices are finding second lives as housing — and that trend directly intersects with our conversion expertise.

    The office market isn't dead. It's restructuring violently. The winners are Class A assets in gateway cities with diversified tenancy. The losers are commodity buildings in markets dependent on single demand drivers. Understanding that distinction is everything.

    Test Your Knowledge

    How well do you know commercial real estate?

    Market BenchmarksHistorical Comparison (Q4 2025)
    JAN 1ST
    4.57%
    LAST MONTH
    4.12%
    10-YR TREASURY (TODAY)
    4.27%
    JAN 1ST
    38.6%
    LAST MONTH
    97.4%
    STUDENT PRE-LEASE
    47.4%
    JAN 1ST
    85.4%
    LAST MONTH
    86.2%
    SENIOR OCCUPANCY
    86.5%
    JAN 1ST
    4.5%
    LAST MONTH
    6.3%
    BTR RENT GROWTH
    6.4%Moderating
    JAN 1ST
    $91.20
    LAST MONTH
    $109.85
    HOSPITALITY REVPAR
    $103.70
    JAN 1ST
    760k
    LAST MONTH
    718k
    ACTIVE RESI UNITS
    704k
    Multifamily Market BenchmarksHistorical Comparison (May 2026)
    JAN 1ST
    6.4%
    LAST WEEK
    5.9%
    MF VACANCY RATE
    5.9%
    JAN 1ST
    1.2%
    LAST WEEK
    2.1%
    MF RENT GROWTH
    2.2%
    JAN 1ST
    5.3%
    LAST WEEK
    5.12%
    MF AVG CAP RATE
    5.13%
    JAN 1ST
    62k
    LAST WEEK
    87k
    MF NET ABSORPTION
    88k
    JAN 1ST
    89k
    LAST WEEK
    99k
    MF NEW SUPPLY
    100k
    JAN 1ST
    0.82%
    LAST WEEK
    0.78%
    MF LOAN DELINQUENCY
    0.79%
    Andrew LeBaron's signature

    Andrew LeBaron

    Sources & References

    Email

    Comments (0)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Andrew LeBaron

    Andrew LeBaron

    13+ Years in Real Estate & Capital Raising

    Covering commercial real estate projects he is connected to and niche commercial RE trends including student & senior housing, adaptive reuse, hotel conversions, and the intersection of faith and finance.

    LinkedIn

    You Might Also Like

    Never Miss an Insight

    Join 23,000+ readers. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Loading publication…

    I send one weekly newsletter covering all of these topics. Let me know what interests you most so I can write what matters to you.

    The LeBaron Letter

    All the data contained within this website is as of 2026 unless otherwise noted. The material on this website is intended for informational purposes only, does not constitute investment advice or analysis, or a recommendation, or an offer of solicitation, and is not the basis for any contract or other agreement to make any investment, or for Andrew LeBaron, LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC, or any of their affiliated entities to enter into or arrange any type of transaction. Nothing on this website should be construed as a guarantee of any particular outcome or result.

    Past Performance: Any performance data or comments expressed on this website are an indication of past performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and no representation is being made that any investment will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those achieved in the past, or that significant losses will be avoided. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.

    Forward-Looking Statements: The contents of this website may contain forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections about the real estate industry, the financial industry, the economy, Andrew LeBaron, LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC, and their affiliated entities and investments. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Furthermore, Andrew LeBaron and LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC undertake no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    No Professional Advice: The information provided on this website does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or other professional advice. You should consult your own professional advisors before making any investment decisions. Andrew LeBaron and LeBaron Capital Partners, LLC are not registered investment advisors, broker-dealers, or financial planners.